[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1189056223.3102.99.camel@raven.themaw.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:23:43 +0800
From: Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frank van Maarseveen <frankvm@...nkvm.com>,
Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>,
'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:50 +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:37 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net> wrote:
> >
> > > But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example.
> >
> > I was referring specifically to the R/O / R/W variants of the same mount. Any
> > flag variation that varies the way the NFS client talks to the NFS server must
> > either result in a new superblock or be ignored.
> >
> > David
>
> We currently ignore remount requests that attempt to change the NFS
> mount parameters. This is not new behaviour, BTW: it has always been the
> case, and nobody has ever requested it.
Yes, I only mentioned it because I'm aware it.
I've not payed much attention to it because there haven't been any
complaints so far and it's been a long time.
Ian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists