lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070906203412.GB27657@lazybastard.org>
Date:	Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:34:12 +0200
From:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/26] Slab defragmentation V5

On Fri, 31 August 2007 18:41:07 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> 
> The trouble with this patchset is that it is difficult to validate.
> Activities are only performed when special load situations are encountered.
> Are there any tests that could give meaningful information about
> the effectiveness of these measures? I have run various tests here
> creating and deleting files and building kernels under low memory situations
> to trigger these reclaim mechanisms but how does one measure their
> effectiveness?

One could play with updatedb followed by a memhog.  How much time passes
and how many slab objects have to be freed before the memhog has
allocated N% of physical memory?  Both numbers are relevant.  The first
indicates how quickly pages are reclaimed from slab caches, while the
second show how many objects remain cached for future lookups.  Updatedb
aside, caching objects is done for solid performance reasons.

Creating a qemu image with little memory and a huge directory hierarchy
filled with 0-byte files may be a nice test system.  Unless you beat me
to it I'll try to set it up once logfs is in merge-worthy shape.

Jörn

-- 
A quarrel is quickly settled when deserted by one party; there is
no battle unless there be two.
-- Seneca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ