[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070906160429.629c9497.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:04:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] Linux Kernel Markers - Architecture Independent
Code
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:00:01 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:07:34 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > Changelog:
> > - markers_mutex now nests inside module_mutex rather than the opposite.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> > Reviewed-by: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
>
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches recognizes Signed-off-by: and
> Acked-by:. Nothing about Reviewed-by. Quote:
>
> Acked-by: is not as formal as Signed-off-by:. It is a record that the acker
> has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated acceptance.
>
> Reviewed-by: carries no such connotation or indication IMO.
> Please use Acked-by if that's what these reviewers have done.
Yeah. We will start introducing Reviewed-by: (I haven't yet quite worked
out how yet) but it will be a quite formal thing and it would be something
which the reviewer explicitly provided. For now, let's please stick with
acked-by (if those individuals did indeed send an acked-by)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists