linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 06 Sep 2007 10:57:46 +0100
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, stable@...nel.org,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix preemptible lazy mode bug

Andi Kleen wrote:
>> I agree.  The patch is a nop.  I just got overly paranoid.  The whole
>> thing is just very prone to bugs.
>>     
> So do we need a patch for .23 or not?
>   

Forgot this bit.  No, I think the upshot is that it isn't necessary (nor
Rusty's).

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/