linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for vmlinux

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1189185598.7636.4.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:19:58 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for
	vmlinux

On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 19:24 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Daniel.
> 
> > > I did that before I posted patches to lkml.
> > > IOW: posted patches are not broken versus module loading.
> > 
> > Ok, this is more like the explanation I was looking for..
> > 
> > During this thread you seemed to indicate the patches you release
> > reduced the kernel ~10% , but now your saying that was pre-release ,
> > right? 
> 
> What are you after here?
> 
> If you read the inital post you see the actual savings and you also
> can read that it works wiht modules. The precentage can be calculated
> from these numbers if you are interested.

Right, but he contradicted that during the course of this thread.. Which
is why I'm asking about it..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/