linux-kernel - Re: Intel Memory Ordering White Paper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200709081854.57549.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Sat, 8 Sep 2007 18:54:57 +1000
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Intel Memory Ordering White Paper

On Saturday 08 September 2007 08:26, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> FYI, we just released a new white paper describing memory ordering for
> Intel processors:
> http://developer.intel.com/products/processor/manuals/index.htm
>
> Should help answer some questions about some of the ordering primitives
> we use on i386 and x86_64.

So, can we finally noop smp_rmb and smp_wmb on x86?

View attachment "x86-barrier-opt.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (1012 bytes)