linux-kernel - Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200709080717.58271.prakash@punnoor.de>
Date:	Sat, 8 Sep 2007 07:17:58 +0200
From:	Prakash Punnoor <prakash@...noor.de>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?

On the day of Friday 07 September 2007 Chuck Ebbert hast written:
> On 09/06/2007 07:31 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com> writes:
> >> Some systems lock up without the noapic option.
> >
> > Please find patterns: cpu type, chipsets, mainboard vendors etc.
>
> This is the first one I've actually had in front of me:
>
>   HP TX1000 notebook
>   Nvidia C51/MCP51 mobile chipset

Do you have a hpet? If not, have you tried using acpi_use_timer_override with 
apic?

bye,
-- 
(°=                 =°)
//\ Prakash Punnoor /\\
V_/                 \_V

Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)