[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1189425813.21778.13.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:03:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc5: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
On Sun, 2007-09-02 at 15:11 +0200, Christian Kujau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after upgrading to 2.6.23-rc5 (and applying davem's fix [0]), lockdep
> was quite noisy when I tried to shape my external (wireless) interface:
>
> [ 6400.534545] FahCore_78.exe/3552 just changed the state of lock:
> [ 6400.534713] (&dev->ingress_lock){-+..}, at: [<c038d595>] netif_receive_skb+0x2d5/0x3c0
> [ 6400.534941] but this lock took another, soft-read-irq-unsafe lock in the past:
> [ 6400.535145] (police_lock){-.--}
>
> This happened when I executed: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.23-rc5/qos.sh.txt
> (using iproute2-ss070313). The is still running, I just noticed a short
> hickup, probably when it was busy writing the warning to the disk.
>
> More details and .config: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.23-rc5/
seems unavailable at this time, please submit the whole lockdep report
if possible.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists