[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0709100853340.24030@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:59:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@...hat.com>
cc: linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...l.ru>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: Fix interrupt enable in i8042_ctr when enabling
interrupt fails
--
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
> I believe this possible, but unlikely (perhaps not so unlikely on
> virtual machines). Scenarios involve enable succeeding the first
> time, failing the second time, and succeeding the third time. I can
> provide details, but the point I'd like to make is not that this is
> broken (although it is, strictly speaking), but that it is not
> obviously correct where it easily could be: just clear the interrupt
> enable bits when writing them to the hardware failed, like the old
> code did.
>
I also want to stress that this is more of a clean up for "technically
correct" code than a bug fix. This bug probably would never happen on
baremetal unless it was running on broken hardware.
BUT!!!
With more and more systems going to a virtual environment, having a bug or
some other anomaly can trigger the error that this patch prevents. The
patch will also trigger a print in the case of running on a buggy virtual
machine, which would help out the developers of that virtual machine to
fix their code.
Please apply.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists