lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:01:34 +0200
From:	Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND 2][PATCH 3/4] modify account_system_time() to update
 guest time in cpustat and task_struct

Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:12:58 +0200 Laurent Vivier wrote:
> 
>> [PATCH 3/4] modify account_system_time() to add cputime to cpustat->guest if we
>> are running a VCPU. We add this cputime to  cpustat->user instead of
>> cpustat->system because this part of KVM code is in fact user code although it
>> is executed in the kernel. We duplicate VCPU time between guest and user to
>> allow an unmodified "top(1)" to display correct value. A modified "top(1)" is
>> able to display good cpu user time and cpu guest time by subtracting cpu guest
>> time from cpu user time. Update "gtime" in task_struct accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@...l.net>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> Please use kernel-doc notation here:
> (see Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt or source file examples
> or ask)
> 
> easy fix:
> 
>  /*
> + * Account guest cpu time to a process.
> 
> /**
>  * account_guest_time - Account guest cpu time to a process.
> 
> + * @p: the process that the cpu time gets accounted to
> + * @cputime: the cpu time spent in virtual machine since the last update
> + */
> +void account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime)
> +{

thank you for the comment.

But I just made a cut&past of the comment of the function above.

Should I be consistent with the doc or with the source ?

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier@...l.net  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ