[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070910172836.GB16048@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:58:36 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:53:34PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?
>
> *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names
> would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO!
>
> Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.
s/cptctlr/cpuctlr !
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists