linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709101942080.5368@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:42:23 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure


On Sep 10 2007 22:58, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:53:34PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
>> > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller?
>> 
>> *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names
>> would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO!
>> 
>> Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is.
>
>s/cptctlr/cpuctlr !

Captain Controller to the rescue!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/