[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070910105410.25e1d54c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 10:54:10 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, perex@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] unexport sys_{open,read}
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:44:54 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> > A single kernel release seems sufficient. It gives the maintainers of such
> > code time to hear about the breakage and time to fix it.
>
> Users don't report warnings generally. They won't even see modprobe
> warnings or anything in dmesg. Short of using their sound card to scream
> "Next release you are screwed" they won't notice (and if you the sound
> card trick they'll think they got rooted....)
>
I once made the mistake of putting a "please tell andrewm@....edu.au" printk
in 3c59x.c. My inbox nearly died. Then there's that damned "PCI bus hidden
behind transparent bus" printk which I've actually removed from -mm because
so many people keep reporting it and we don't do anything about it.
All it takes is a couple of people to report the problem to the maintainer
over a few-weeks period. It doesn't seem unreasonable to expect this to
happen.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists