linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][Intel-IOMMU] Fix for IOMMU early crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070910202543.GS4374@rhun.haifa.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:25:43 +0300
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, akpm@...l.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kristen.c.accardi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][Intel-IOMMU] Fix for IOMMU early crash

On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:42:31AM -0700, Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:

> Yes, I agree that pci_dev->sysdata can;t be removed. Even we (IOMMU)
> were dependent on this field but somehow this field is being
> overwritten to point to pci_bus's->sysdata and hence IOMMU was
> failing. Earlier it was overwritten to NULL and hence we were not
> failing but now it is overwritten to non-NULL and hence we fail.

Do you know which commit caused that change?

> My therory is that we don;t need to copy pci_bus's->sysdata to 
> pci_dev's->sysdata. Below patch solves my problem.
> Any objection to below patch?

I will give it a spin to verify it works for me, but in general I am
wary of making such changes unless we can verify (read: audit) that
they have no adverse side effects *on all architectures*.

Cheers,
Muli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/