[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830709101545s66fd338dob6932407db4e1002@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:45:15 -0700
From: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To: "Dmitry Adamushko" <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com>
Cc: vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org,
"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure
On 9/10/07, Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@...il.com> wrote:
> On 10/09/2007, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:22:59AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > objection ;) "cpuctlr" isn't memorable. Kernel code is write-rarely,
> > > read-often. "cpu_controller", please. The extra typing is worth it ;)
> >
> > Ok! Here's the modified patch (against 2.6.23-rc4-mm1).
>
> as everyone seems to be in a quest for a better name... I think, the
> obvious one would be just 'group_sched'.
>
But "sched" on its own could refer to CPU scheduling, I/O scheduling,
network scheduling, ...
And "group" is more or less implied by the fact that it's in the
containers/control groups filesystem.
So "group_sched" isn't really all that informative. The name should
definitely contain either "cpu" or "cfs".
Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists