linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1IUYpP-0000z6-BS@jroun>
Date:	Mon, 10 Sep 2007 11:16:43 +0900
From:	hooanon05@...oo.co.jp
To:	"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" <jsipek@...sunysb.edu>
Cc:	Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	hch@...radead.org, Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Union Mount: Readdir approaches 


Hello Jeff,

"Josef 'Jeff' Sipek":
> Unless I missunderstood something, Unionfs uses the same approach. Even
> Unionfs's ODF branch does the same thing. The major difference is that we
> keep the cache in a file on a disk.

The approach unionfs-2.1.2 took differs from mine.
Major difference is,
- in this approach, the cache in struct file is the completed virtual
  disk block for the dir.
- readdir doesn't have to call vfs_readdir when the cache exists and is
  valid. simply calls filldir.
- it supports SEEK_END.


Junjiro Okajima
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/