linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix failure to resume from initrds.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709110736440.16478@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2007 07:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>, nigel@...pend2.net,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix failure to resume from initrds.



On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Anyway, yes, init is freezable, but should it be?
> > 
> > I mean, shouldn't we rather add PF_NOFREEZE to kernel_init()?
> 
> Argh, no.  PF_NOFREEZE is inherited by the children.

Umm. All of this is __init code - why is freezability even an issue? We 
shouldn't be suspending at this point anyway afaik..

Is suspend2 perhaps doing something different here? 

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/