[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070911145131.GN32388@localdomain>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:51:31 -0500
From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>
To: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@...ibm.com>
Cc: LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
OF-General <general@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
OF-EWG <ewg@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>,
Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] IB/ehca: Replace get_paca()->paca_index by the more portable smp_processor_id()
Hi,
Joachim Fenkes wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@...ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_tools.h | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_tools.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_tools.h
> index f9b264b..863f972 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_tools.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_tools.h
> @@ -73,37 +73,37 @@ extern int ehca_debug_level;
> if (unlikely(ehca_debug_level)) \
> dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, (ib_dev)->dma_device, \
> "PU%04x EHCA_DBG:%s " format "\n", \
> - get_paca()->paca_index, __FUNCTION__, \
> + smp_processor_id(), __FUNCTION__, \
> ## arg); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define ehca_info(ib_dev, format, arg...) \
> dev_info((ib_dev)->dma_device, "PU%04x EHCA_INFO:%s " format "\n", \
> - get_paca()->paca_index, __FUNCTION__, ## arg)
> + smp_processor_id(), __FUNCTION__, ## arg)
>
> #define ehca_warn(ib_dev, format, arg...) \
> dev_warn((ib_dev)->dma_device, "PU%04x EHCA_WARN:%s " format "\n", \
> - get_paca()->paca_index, __FUNCTION__, ## arg)
> + smp_processor_id(), __FUNCTION__, ## arg)
>
> #define ehca_err(ib_dev, format, arg...) \
> dev_err((ib_dev)->dma_device, "PU%04x EHCA_ERR:%s " format "\n", \
> - get_paca()->paca_index, __FUNCTION__, ## arg)
> + smp_processor_id(), __FUNCTION__, ## arg)
I think I see these macros used in preemptible code (e.g. ehca_probe),
where smp_processor_id() will print a warning when
CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y. Probably better to use raw_smp_processor_id.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists