[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709110949250.16478@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
cc: sct@...hat.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, adilger@...sterfs.com,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc6: hanging ext3 dbench tests
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>
> I have a couple of failed test runs against 2.6.23-rc6 where the
> job timed out while running dbench over ext3. Both on powerpc,
> though both significantly different hardware setups. A failed
> run like this implies that the machine was still responsive to
> other processes but the dbench was making no progress. There is
> no console diagnostics during the failure.
Since the machine seems to be otherwise alive, can you do a sysrq-W (which
is most easily done by just doing a
echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger
and you don't actually need any console access or anything like that).
That should give you all the blocked process traces, and if it's a
deadlock on some semaphore or other, it should all stand out quite nicely.
In fact, things like the above are probably worth scripting for any
automated testing - if you auto-fail after some time, please make the
failure case do that sysrq-W by default.
(The other sysrq things can be useful too - "T" shows the same as "W",
except for _all_ tasks, which is often so verbose that it hides the
problem, but is sometimes the right thing to do).
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists