[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070911051453.GB5053@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:44:53 +0530
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, discuss@...-64.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [discuss] [patch 3/5] Use extended crashkernel command line on x86_64
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:52:58PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> * Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> [2007-09-09 19:27]:
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
> > ...
> >
> > CONFIG_KEXEC or CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP?
>
> Good question. The crashkernel parameter was CONFIG_KEXEC before, and
> I also wondered why, but I didn't change this because maybe there's
> some reason I don't know.
>
> Vivek, do you know why this was CONFIG_KEXEC?
>
>
Bernhard,
As Eric mentioned, CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP has been used for all dump capturing
infrastructure and rest of the kexec and kexec on panic functionality
has been put under CONFIG_KEXEC.
Keeping memory reservation under CONFIG_KEXEC helps in a sense when
somebody is not using a relocatable kernel and uses a custom kernel for dump
capture. In that case he does not have to enable CONFIG_CRASH_DUMP in the
first kernel.
Thanks
Vivek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists