linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070911172137.GF20907@suse.de>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:21:37 +0200
From:	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
To:	kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line

* Lombard, David N <dnlombar@...ips.intel.com> [2007-09-11 17:32]:
> 
> lilo:
>   append=<string>
> 
>     Appends the options specified to the parameter line passed to
>     the kernel. 

Given that lilo appends the user-specified command line, I think it's
the best to honor the last value. It has also been the previous
behaviour (execpt IA64).

Having a different behaviour if the last or the first value is honored
on different architectures is not what we want, IMO.


Thanks,
   Bernhard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/