[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070911203412.GS3563@stusta.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:34:13 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 10:12:19PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>...
> In a meged x86 tree it would be very beneficial to either include
> in the filename that a specific file is i386 or x86_64 specific or
> stuff them in a separate subdirectory.
>
> If legacy.c numa.c, pcibios.c and visws.c placed in a directory named i386
> then it would be obvious that this is i386 only.
> Or they could be named filename_32 (or the uglier filename_i386).
> As it stands out today the filename are kept but thier relationship are lost.
>...
I'm not agreeing with you on this.
It seems artificial to think 32bit<->64bit was the only interesting
distinction on x86 machines.
You might as well create different directories for i386<->i486+ or
pre-i686<->i686+.
As an example, visws.c is as much non-64bit as it is pre-i686.
> Sam
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists