[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070911211422.GU3563@stusta.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:14:22 +0200
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 09:38:10PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>...
> In the end it won't make much difference where the files are located
> (although I frankly don't see the advantage of this intrusive move).
>
> You always have to at least compile test both if you change one and I doubt
> most people will be able to avoid this no matter how the Makefile looks
> or where the files are.
>...
The important point is:
People do not expect code under arch/i386/ to be used by code under
arch/x86_64/ and vice versa.
That regularly results in people sending patches that don't compile on
the other architecture.
With one architecture it's much more obvious that the code is shared.
> -Andi
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists