[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1189492636.25767.62.camel@chaos>
Date:	Tue, 11 Sep 2007 08:37:16 +0200
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: clockevents: fix resume logic
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 14:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> >     clockevents: fix resume logic
> >     
> >     We need to make sure, that the clockevent devices are resumed, before
> >     the tick is resumed. The current resume logic does not guarantee this.
> >     
> >     Add CLOCK_EVT_MODE_RESUME and call the set mode functions of the clock
> >     event devices before resuming the tick / oneshot functionality.
> >     
> >     Fixup the existing users.
> >     
> >     Thanks to Nigel Cunningham for tracking down a long standing thinko,
> >     which affected the jinxed VAIO.
> >     
> 
> This patch broke the jinxed vaio.
> 
> Which is a bit odd, considering that I must have tested it at the time. 
> But I bisected it right down to this commit, and the below revert patch
> fixed it up.
I just looked up, that you confirmed earlier that the patch does _not_
break the VAIO. 
I think, that some other suspend/resume/ACPI or whatever change went in
before this patch got merged into Linus tree. Sigh. That's pretty hard
to find out.
	tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists