[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200709121209.10068.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:09:09 +0200
From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] ssb: Make pcmciahost depend on PCMCIA=y
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 04:11:00 Paul Mundt wrote:
> SSB uses a bool (SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE) to determine whether to
> build in PCMCIA support or not, as the PCMCIA host code itself is
> also only a bool, make SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE depend on PCMCIA=y.
>
> Without this, SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE evaluates to y when PCMCIA
> is built as a module, which results in link errors due to the
> pcmcia_access_configuration_register() accesses, where the symbol
> is only defined in a module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
>
> --
>
> drivers/ssb/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-09-11 15:15:52.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1/drivers/ssb/Kconfig 2007-09-12 10:51:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>
> config SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE
> bool
> - depends on SSB && PCMCIA && EXPERIMENTAL
> + depends on SSB && PCMCIA=y && EXPERIMENTAL
> default y
>
> config SSB_PCMCIAHOST
>
>
There we go. The usual SELECT dependency hell again...
Would changing SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE to tristate also fix it?
What would be the sideeffects?
I think this PCMCIA=y is not good, because it's perfectly
legal to build PCMCIA as module, while SSB and everything
that depends on SSB is also a module.
Would tristate fix that?
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists