lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:08:27 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>
cc:	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	akpm <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] doc: about email clients for Linux kernel patches


On Sep 11 2007 21:26, Chris Friesen wrote:
>> > Can someone describe the problems with just attaching the patch in
>> > Thunderbird?  It's what Martin says he does on the linked document...
>
>> Email clients don't like to quote attachments, even text/plain ones, which
>> then makes attached patches much more difficult to review and comment on
>> (i.e. you greatly reduce the number of reviewers).
>
> Thunderbird, at least, will automatically inline a single text/plain attachment
> when replying. (At least with my current settings, it does.)

No, the thing is: you send it attached with Thunderbird,
and my PINE strips it on reply _because_ it is an attachment.



	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ