lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709122013230.22467@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:14:14 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback


On Sep 11 2007 14:51, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> 
>> Will that cause people to compile test both? I have my doubts that 
>> will really work.
>
>If people don't compile-test both now, then why would they compile-test 
>things when merged?
>
>So no, that's not the point.
>
>But at least things like "grep" will work sanely, and people will be 
>*aware* that "Oh, this touches a file that may be used by the other 
>word-size".

Speaking of which, how does sparc/sparc64 handle things?




	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ