linux-kernel - Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1189621385.31502.111.camel@tara.firmix.at>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:23:04 +0200
From:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Dan Stromberg <dstromberglists@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?

On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 20:16 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > 
> > But we are talking[0] about a kernel-source-$VERSION.$ARCH.rpm's which
> > contain
> > the kernel sources (read: lots of .c and .h files, etc.) - including a
> > matching
> > .config and after `make oldconfig` - so that one can build out-of-tree
> > modules
> > after installing it with "KSRC=" (or whatever the Makefile parameter is
> > usually called).
> You need certain things of the kernel built before you can build
> external modules (if they use a sane build approach).
> Just including the .config with the kernel source is far from enough.

ACK.
That all must be done/prepared correctly for the kernel-source-*.rpm.
And nobody said it is trivial or easy.

	Bernd
-- 
Firmix Software GmbH                   http://www.firmix.at/
mobil: +43 664 4416156                 fax: +43 1 7890849-55
          Embedded Linux Development and Services


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/