[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18151.20636.425784.226044@stoffel.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:36:12 -0400
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
miklos@...redi.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, neilb@...e.de,
dgc@....com, tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com, nikita@...sterfs.com,
trond.myklebust@....uio.no, yingchao.zhou@...il.com,
richard@....demon.co.uk, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/23] mm: per device dirty threshold
Peter> Scale writeback cache per backing device, proportional to its
Peter> writeout speed. By decoupling the BDI dirty thresholds a
Peter> number of problems we currently have will go away, namely:
Ah, this clarifies my questions! Thanks!
Peter> - mutual interference starvation (for any number of BDIs);
Peter> - deadlocks with stacked BDIs (loop, FUSE and local NFS mounts).
Peter> It might be that all dirty pages are for a single BDI while
Peter> other BDIs are idling. By giving each BDI a 'fair' share of the
Peter> dirty limit, each one can have dirty pages outstanding and make
Peter> progress.
Question, can you change (shrink) the limit on a BDI while it has IO
in flight? And what will that do to the system? I.e. if you have one
device doing IO, so that it has a majority of the dirty limit. Then
another device starts IO, and it's a *faster* device, how
quickly/slowly does the BDI dirty limits change for both the old and
new device?
Peter> A global threshold also creates a deadlock for stacked BDIs;
Peter> when A writes to B, and A generates enough dirty pages to get
Peter> throttled, B will never start writeback until the dirty pages
Peter> go away. Again, by giving each BDI its own 'independent' dirty
Peter> limit, this problem is avoided.
Peter> So the problem is to determine how to distribute the total
Peter> dirty limit across the BDIs fairly and efficiently. A DBI that
You mean BDI here, not DBI.
Peter> has a large dirty limit but does not have any dirty pages
Peter> outstanding is a waste.
Peter> What is done is to keep a floating proportion between the DBIs
Peter> based on writeback completions. This way faster/more active
Peter> devices get a larger share than slower/idle devices.
Does a slower device get a BDI which is calculated to keep it's limit
under a certain number of seconds of outstanding IO? This way no
device can build up more than say 15 seconds of outstanding IO to
flush at any one time.
Thanks!
John
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists