linux-kernel - Re: [BUGFIX] x86_64: NX bit handling in change_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1189577923.23838.6.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:18:43 +0800
From:	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] x86_64: NX bit handling in change_page_attr

On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 20:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:28:38 +0800 "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
> 
> > This patch fixes a bug of change_page_attr/change_page_attr_addr on
> > Intel x86_64 CPU. After changing page attribute to be executable with
> > these functions, the page remains un-executable on Intel x86_64
> > CPU. Because on Intel x86_64 CPU, only if the "NX" bits of all four
> > level page tables are cleared, the corresponding page is executable
> > (refer to section 4.13.2 of Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
> > Developer's Manual). So, the bug is fixed through clearing the "NX"
> > bit of PMD when splitting the huge PMD.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/arch/x86_64/mm/pageattr.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2.orig/arch/x86_64/mm/pageattr.c	2007-08-17 12:50:25.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2-mm2/arch/x86_64/mm/pageattr.c	2007-08-17 12:50:48.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@
> >  			split = split_large_page(address, prot, ref_prot2);
> >  			if (!split)
> >  				return -ENOMEM;
> > +			pgprot_val(ref_prot2) &= ~_PAGE_NX;
> >  			set_pte(kpte, mk_pte(split, ref_prot2));
> >  			kpte_page = split;
> >  		}
> 
> What happened with this?  Still valid?

I am waiting for reviewing or merging. And I think it is still valid.

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/