linux-kernel - Re: Socket-related problem in x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46E7A4ED.5971.189F731B@Ulrich.Windl.rkdvmks1.ngate.uni-regensburg.de>
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:35:57 +0200
From:	"Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@...uni-regensburg.de>
To:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Socket-related problem in x86_64 Kernel (2.6.16.53-0.8-smp)?

On 11 Sep 2007 at 17:04, Al Viro wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 05:54:38PM +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> 
> > If not, any clues on debugging/tracing? There's a 
> > /usr/src/linux/Documentation/oops-tracing.txt, but no "segfault-tracing".
> 
> That would be because it has fsck-all to do with the kernel.  Get the
> coredump, then use gdb to deal with it.

Ok, but why is the message there at all? I think in Windows/XP the offending code 
and the registers are shown in such occasions. I'd say either drop the message, or 
improve it. It's also difficult to find the code after the program is gone due to 
mapping of shared libraries. I managed to get a core dump of the application 
however, and I did modify some code. I'll report once I have results.

Maybe it's "mea culpa" for my program, but powersaved and slapd are still to be 
examined.

Regards,
Ulrich

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/