[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <34d2658a9aa616e0971bfc3ea4c747772fd60cb1.1189583010.git.michael@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:43:41 +1000 (EST)
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>
Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/15] Call spu_acquire_saved() before calculating the SPU note sizes
It makes sense to stop the SPU processes as soon as possible. Also if we
dont acquire_saved() I think there's a possibility that the value in
csa.priv2.spu_lslr_RW won't be accurate.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
index 6663669..21283f6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/coredump.c
@@ -135,7 +135,9 @@ static int spufs_arch_notes_size(void)
fd = 0;
while ((ctx = coredump_next_context(&fd)) != NULL) {
+ spu_acquire_saved(ctx);
rc = spufs_ctx_note_size(ctx, fd);
+ spu_release_saved(ctx);
if (rc < 0)
break;
--
1.5.1.3.g7a33b
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists