[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070913014905.GV995458@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:49:05 +1000
From: David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, andrea@...e.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...il.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>,
swin wang <wangswin@...il.com>, totty.lu@...il.com,
hugh@...itas.com, joern@...ybastard.org
Subject: Re: [00/41] Large Blocksize Support V7 (adds memmap support)
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 01:27:33AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > IOWs, we already play these vmap harm-minimisation games in the places
> > where we can, but still the overhead is high and something we'd prefer
> > to be able to avoid.
>
> I don't think you've looked nearly far enough with all this low hanging
> fruit.
Ok, so we need to hack the vm to optimise it further. When it comes to
TLB flush code and optimising that sort of stuff, I'm out of my depth.
> I just gave 4 things which combined might easily reduce xfs vmap overhead
> by several orders of magnitude, all without changing much code at all.
Patches would be greatly appreciately. You obviously understand this
vm code much better than I do, so if it's easy to fix by adding some
generic vmap cache thingy, please do.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists