linux-kernel - Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709131419170.1817@scrub.home>
Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:35:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements

Hi,

On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > Out of curiousity: will I ever get answers to my questions?
> 
> the last few weeks/months have been pretty hectic - i get more than 50 
> non-list emails a day so i could easily have missed some.

Well, let's just take the recent "Really Simple Really Fair Scheduler" 
thread. You had the time to ask me questions about my scheduler, I even 
explained to you how the sleeping bonus works in my model. At the end I 
was sort of hoping you would start answering my questions and explaining 
things how the same things work in CFS - but nothing.
Then you had the time to reimplement the very things you've just asked me 
about and what do I get credit for - "two cleanups from RFS".
And now I get this lame ass excuse for not answering my questions? :-(

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/