[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a4e6962a0709130638v384c2708y76167d4e92cbac56@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:38:06 -0500
From: "Eric Van Hensbergen" <ericvh@...il.com>
To: "Latchesar Ionkov" <lucho@...kov.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 9p: rename uid and gid parameters
On 9/12/07, Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net> wrote:
> Change the names of 'uid' and 'gid' parameters to the more appropriate
> 'dfltuid' and 'dfltgid'.
>
...
> strcpy(v9ses->name, V9FS_DEFUSER);
> strcpy(v9ses->remotename, V9FS_DEFANAME);
> + v9ses->dfltuid = V9FS_DEFUID;
> + v9ses->dfltgid = V9FS_DEFGID;
>
...
> +#define V9FS_DEFUID (0)
> +#define V9FS_DEFGID (0)
I'm not sure if there is a good solution here, but I'm uncomfortable
with using uid=0 as the default. I'm not sure if there is a default
uid for nobody, but anything is probably better than 0. Looks like
nfsnobody is 65534, we could use that - even if only as a marker for
the server to map it to nobody on the target system? What do you
think?
Particularly with attach-per-user, we probably need to look at
interacting with idmapd or create our own variant real soon.
-eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists