linux-kernel - Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2007 19:09:18 +0200
From:	Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@...mhuis.info>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>,
	Dan Stromberg <dstromberglists@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Building a kernel-source RPM (not a kernel RPM)?

Hi Sam!

On 12.09.2007 22:03, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> I think the Fedora approach has many benefits -- I always wondered why
>> it never went upstream like a "make install_develstuff" that install all
>> the needed bits to
>>   /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/
> Last time I saw the patch is was to ugly to consider.

Do you have a pointer to that patch?

Note that in Fedora it seems all (most of) the logic is afaics in the
rpm spec file itself and thus not suitable for the kernel  :-/

> Now that is maybe a year ago and I would be happy to take another look
> should someone submit it to me.

Maybe I should take a closer look at it sooner or later myself...

Cu
knurd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/