[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070913201559.GB1131@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 22:15:59 +0200
From: "Andreas Herrmann" <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>,
"Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>, "Martin Mares" <mj@....cz>,
"dean gaudet" <dean@...tic.org>,
"Robert Richter" <robert.richter@....com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: set cfg_size for AMD Family 10h in case
MMCONFIG is used
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 10:20:56AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > BIOS guys also said that fam 10h need mmconfig via eax accessing, may
> > need OS do sth, so it is safe to stay with MCFG entry for SB like
> > mcp55...
> >
> > but latest kernel already have that workaround to make mmconfig via eax...
> >
>
> This is actually a good point. Since the CPU vendor managed to
> completely fuck up the operation of MMCONFIG itself on this CPU (it's a
> *MEMORY REFERENCE*, guys!), it is actually to be expected and prudent
> that BIOS vendors will drop the MCFG entry. MMCONFIG doesn't actually
> work on this CPU for any system software which doesn't already know to
> work around this particular piece of severe braindamage;
But wait, isn't it true that Vista is using MCFG?
So, poor BIOS guys what should they do now?
If you have a special problem here why not upgrading your Linux kernel?
> standards-complicant MMCONFIG isn't supported at all.
And yes, it is complicated to follow your argumentation.
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists