[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0709131629010.8150-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 16:31:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] USB autosuspend fixes for 2.6.23-rc6
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Maybe you're concerned about propagating updates as painlessly as
> > possible -- if the whitelist is in the kernel then every kernel release
> > would include an update. But in userspace it's possible to do updates
> > even more quickly and painlessly. For example, there could be a
> > network server available for both interactive lookups and automatic
> > queries from HAL.
> >...
>
> No, what I'm concerned about is that this would require userspace for
> something that is completely in-kernel.
But it isn't completely in-kernel. It is policy, and policy belongs in
userspace.
The kernel provides the mechanism for autosuspending idle devices and
setting the idle-delay length. But userspace must be responsible for
deciding what devices to autosuspend and how long the idle delays
should be.
Alan Stern
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists