[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070914110341.GA4168@shadowen.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 12:03:41 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@...il.com>
Cc: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
paulus@...ba.org, Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
anton@...ba.org, mel@....ul.ie
Subject: Re: [BUG][2.6.23-rc6] Badness at arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c:202
Anton, this seems a little reminicient of that bug which popped up in
2.6.23-rc3 so do with SLB loading (if memory serves), with machine
checks and signal 7's. Of course that is _supposed_ to be fixed by this
time ...
I believe it was Paul who fixed up that one, and he is already copied.
-apw
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 04:07:37PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > With 2.6.23-rc6 running on the ppc64 box, following oops is hit
> >
> > Oops: Machine check, sig: 7 [#1]
> >
> > SMP NR_CPUS=128 pSeries
> >
> > Modules linked in: binfmt_misc ipv6 dm_mod ehci_hcd ohci_hcd usbcore
> >
> > NIP: c0000000000ed560 LR: c0000000000efc7c CTR: c0000000000ed504
> >
> > REGS: c00000000ffef680 TRAP: 0200 Not tainted (2.6.23-rc6-autokern1)
> >
> > MSR: 8000000000109032 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 28002042 XER: 00000010
> >
> > TASK = c0000000ecf9f000[0] 'swapper' THREAD: c00000000ff8c000 CPU: 2
> >
> > GPR00: 0000000000000000 c00000000ffef900 c0000000006fe598 c0000000d7a8f200
> >
> > GPR04: 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 8000000000c26393
> >
> > GPR08: c0000000006b43d0 0000000000000001 0000000000001000 0000000000000000
> >
> > GPR12: 0000000048000048 c0000000005f1700 0000000000000000 0000000007a8dcd0
> >
> > GPR16: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> >
> > GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 0000000000001000 0000000000000000
> >
> > GPR24: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000001000 c0000000063234e8
> >
> > GPR28: 0000000000001000 0000000000000000 c000000000689c08 c00000000ff3a480
> >
> > NIP [c0000000000ed560] .end_bio_bh_io_sync+0x5c/0xac
> >
> > LR [c0000000000efc7c] .bio_endio+0xb4/0xd4
> >
> > Call Trace:
> >
> > [c00000000ffef900] [c00000000ffef990] 0xc00000000ffef990 (unreliable)
> >
> > [c00000000ffef980] [c0000000000efc7c] .bio_endio+0xb4/0xd4
> >
> > [c00000000ffefa10] [c000000000290060] .__end_that_request_first+0x154/0x548
> >
> > [c00000000ffefae0] [c00000000035af10] .scsi_end_request+0x40/0x138
> >
> > [c00000000ffefb80] [c00000000035b234] .scsi_io_completion+0x188/0x454
> >
> > [c00000000ffefc60] [c000000000372a24] .sd_rw_intr+0x2e4/0x338
> >
> > [c00000000ffefd30] [c000000000354548] .scsi_finish_command+0xbc/0xe0
> >
> > [c00000000ffefdc0] [c00000000035bdf0] .scsi_softirq_done+0x140/0x188
> >
> > [c00000000ffefe60] [c000000000293184] .blk_done_softirq+0xa0/0xd0
> >
> > [c00000000ffefef0] [c000000000055e1c] .__do_softirq+0xa8/0x164
> >
> > [c00000000ffeff90] [c000000000023f14] .call_do_softirq+0x14/0x24
> >
> > [c00000000ff8f960] [c00000000000bd30] .do_softirq+0x68/0xac
> >
> > [c00000000ff8f9f0] [c000000000055f70] .irq_exit+0x54/0x6c
> >
> > [c00000000ff8fa70] [c00000000000c358] .do_IRQ+0x170/0x1ac
> >
> > [c00000000ff8fb00] [c000000000004780] hardware_interrupt_entry+0x18/0x98
> >
> > --- Exception: 501 at .pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep+0xe0/0x194
> >
> > LR = .pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep+0xd0/0x194
> >
> > [c00000000ff8fdf0] [0000000000000000] .__start+0x4000000000000000/0x8 (unreliable)
> >
> > [c00000000ff8fe80] [c000000000010bd4] .cpu_idle+0x104/0x1d8
> >
> > [c00000000ff8ff00] [c00000000002672c] .start_secondary+0x160/0x184
> >
> > [c00000000ff8ff90] [c000000000008364] .start_secondary_prolog+0xc/0x10
> >
> > Instruction dump:
> >
> > 409a0030 393f0018 38000080 7d6048a8 7d6b0378 7d6049ad 40a2fff4 38002000
> >
> > 7d2018a8 7d290378 7d2019ad 40a2fff4 <e9230038> e89f0018 e9690000 f8410028
> >
> > Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>
> This oops is the real bug here, but is that a machine check exception?
> If so, it could be a hardware failure what you saw there instead, and not
> really a kernel bug ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists