linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/12] IB/ehca: Add 1 is not longer needed because of firmware interface change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:48:00 +0200
From:	Joachim Fenkes <FENKES@...ibm.com>
To:	Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc:	Christoph Raisch <raisch@...ibm.com>,
	"OF-EWG" <ewg@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
	"OF-General" <general@...ts.openfabrics.org>,
	Hoang-Nam Nguyen <hnguyen@...ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"LinuxPPC-Dev" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
	Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] IB/ehca: Add 1 is not longer needed because of firmware
 interface change

Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> wrote on 12.09.2007 22:21:54:

> What happens if someone runs the new driver with older firmware?  Or
> what if someone upgrades the firmware without updating the driver?

Thanks for pointing our noses to this. Your comment triggered some further 
internal discussions about the meaning of the values for the current 
system implementation. We'll think this one over again and repost the 
final solution in time for 2.6.24-rc1.

If the rest of this patchset is okay with you, could you apply it and 
leave out this one patch? The patchset will apply cleanly without it.

Thanks,
  Joachim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/