[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070914213111.GA24882@askeshav-devel.jf.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:31:12 -0700
From: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
akpm@...l.org, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ak@...e.com
Subject: Re: [patch] Fix BIOS-e820 end address
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:31:59PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:00:02PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:
> > > Subject: [patch] Fix BIOS-e820 end address
> > >
> > > --snip of boot message--
> > > BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> > > BIOS-e820: 0000000000000000 - 00000000000a0000 (usable)
> > > BIOS-e820: 00000000000f0000 - 0000000000100000 (reserved)
> > > BIOS-e820: 0000000000100000 - 000000007fe8cc00 (usable)
> > > ----end snip---
> > >
> > > As you see from above the address 0000000000100000 is both
> > > shown as reserved and usable which is confusing.
> > >
> >
> > I think this is consistent with many other kernel interfaces (such as
> > /proc/X/maps) where the end address is taken to be exclusive: [0xf0000,
> > 0x100000).
>
> Andrew, Please disregard this patch. As Jermy, Jan pointed out, this
> will cause more confusions. Thanks.
I agree, we can discard my patch.
-Anil
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists