linux-kernel - Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46EB0657.40603@codemonkey.ws>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:08:23 -0500
From:	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> Yeah, see, the initial goal was to make it possible to use the KVM
>> paravirtualizations on other hypervisors.  However, I don't think this
>> is really going to be possible in general so maybe it's better to just
>> use leaf 0.  I'll let others chime in before sending a new patch.
>>     
>
> Hm.  Obviously you can just define a signature for "kvm-compatible
> hypercall interface" and make it common that way, but it gets tricky if
> the hypervisor supports multiple hypercall interfaces, including the kvm
> one.  Start the kvm leaves at 0x40001000 or something?
>   

Yeah, that works with me.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>     J
>
>   

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/