linux-kernel - Per option CFLAGS?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46EB141A.7090200@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:07:06 +0200
From:	Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>
To:	Kai Germaschewski <kai@...maschewski.name>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ALSA devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Per option CFLAGS?

Hi Kai, Sam.

I have a single file foo.c that I want to generate two (ALSA) modules from, 
snd-foo2000.ko and snd-foo2001.ko, by compiling with either FOO2000 or 
FOO2001 defined.

I can do this, and ALSA does this a few times, by providing dummy foo2000.c 
and foo2001.c files, like:

=== foo2000.c
#define FOO2000
#include "foo.c"
===

and a regular Makefile

===
foo2000-objs := foo2000.o
foo2001-objs := foo2001.o

obj-$(CONFIG_SND_FOO2000) += snd-foo2000.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SND_F002001) += snd-foo2001.o
===

That #include is a little lame though. Is there a nicer way? I noticed the 
per-file CFLAGS, but given that it's one source file for both, that doesn't fit.

Rene.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/