[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46EC1775.4000709@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:33:41 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>
To: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
CC: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] Refactor hypercall infrastructure
Zachary Amsden wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 16:44 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>
>> So then each module creates a hypercall page using this magic MSR and
>> the hypervisor has to keep track of it so that it can appropriately
>> change the page on migration. The page can only contain a single
>> instruction or else it cannot be easily changed (or you have to be able
>> to prevent the guest from being migrated while in the hypercall page).
>>
>> We're really talking about identical models. Instead of an MSR, the #GP
>> is what tells the hypervisor to update the instruction. The nice thing
>> about this is that you don't have to keep track of all the current
>> hypercall page locations in the hypervisor.
>>
>
> I agree, multiple hypercall pages is insane. I was thinking more of a
> single hypercall page, fixed in place by the hypervisor, not the kernel.
>
> Then each module can read an MSR saying what VA the hypercall page is
> at, and the hypervisor can simply flip one page to switch architectures.
>
That requires a memory hole though. In KVM, we don't have a memory hole.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Zach
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists