lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:36:23 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: x86 merge - a little feedback On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 02:32:58AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 23:14:22 +0200 Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote: > > > People do not expect code under arch/i386/ to be used by code under > > arch/x86_64/ and vice versa. > > [OT: it drives me batshit that we ended up including stuff in both directions] Why? Anyways, i wouldn't have a problem with putting the already shared files into a different directory or move it over to one of the architectures, although I must admit I personally wouldn't see a big benefit from it. But if it gives people a warm fuzzy feeling I'm all for it. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists