linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Move the definition of pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:57:08 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	i2c@...sensors.org, linux-omap-open-source@...ux.omap.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move the definition of pr_err() into kernel.h


On Sep 12 2007 12:59, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> Other pr_*() macros are already defined in kernel.h, but pr_err() was defined
>> multiple times in several other places
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@...escale.com>
>
>pr_error seems better than pr_err
>
>Please add the full set:
>	pr_alert
>	pr_critical
>        pr_error
>        pr_warn
>        pr_notice

I repeat to be totally against this.

(1) You are trying to add pr_*(fmt, arg) as a lazy shorthand for 
printk(KERN_* fmt, arg...) and

(2) do not seem to notice that pr_debug() changes its behavior 
depending on -DDEBUG, which pr_alert() etc. do not, so there
is IMHO no point (that includes the already existing pr_info()).
Why not just obsolete printk() altogether then?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/