linux-kernel - Re: Can LVM block I/O and hang a system?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070915023953.d364349d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:39:53 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Maurice Volaski <mvolaski@...om.yu.edu>
Cc:	linux-lvm@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can LVM block I/O and hang a system?

On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:09:14 -0400 Maurice Volaski <mvolaski@...om.yu.edu> wrote:

> A working system begins hanging and it seems to be stuck on I/O 
> processes that use ext3 partitions that are running on top of LVM. 
> The system is AMD 64-bit running Gentoo. Kernel is Gentoo 2.6.22-r3 
> and LVM lvm2-2.02.27. Here is the disk setup:
> 
> Boot disk, attached to motherboard via SATA
> 1) some partitions accessed via ext3 -> hardware partition.
> 2) some partitions accessed via ext3 -> drbd, which is version 8.0.5, 
> -> hardware partition.
> 
> External SATA-SCSI RAID, attached to via an LSI Logic card,
> 3) one partition accessed via ext3 -> drbd -> hardware partition.
> 4) some partitions accessed via ext3 -> LVM -> drbd -> hardware partition.
> 
> On repeated reboots, #1) boots fine, and I can fsck #2) no problem. I 
> can also fsck #3, but the fsck processes on #4, which all are trying 
> to recover the journals, just seem to not do anything. There is no 
> evidence of I/O and there are no errors reported anywhere. The frozen 
> fsck processes cannot even be killed and the system ignores the 
> shutdown command.
> 
> That the hanging fsck processes are all occurring on just the LVM 
> partitions seems to imply that LVM is responsible.
> 
> drbd had been unattached to its peer during this time, and when I 
> reattached it, it had no trouble syncing to the peer. That system, 
> which should basically be identical, however, has no trouble running 
> running fsck everywhere. I'm not sure, though, if that lets LVM off 
> the hook.

Next time it hangs, please do

dmesg -c
echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger
dmesg -s 1000000 > foo

and send foo.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/