[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070914114042M.tomof@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:52:38 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>
To: stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de
Cc: tomof@....org, lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca,
james.bottomley@...eleye.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
jeff@...zik.org, andi@...stfloor.org, folkert@...heusden.com,
bunk@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH update] SCSI: update Kconfig help text to indicate SCSI
core's widespread usage
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:16:03 +0200
Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:14:21 +0200 (CEST)
> > Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> wrote:
> ...
> >> And one more update:
> >> There is SAS too,
> ...
> >> + You need it
> >> + - for classic parallel SCSI hardware,
> >> + - for newer SCSI transports such as Fibre Channel, FireWire storage,
> >> + SAS, or iSCSI,
> >
> > There is SRP too.
>
> I think I'll rewrite it as "for newer SCSI transports such as FireWire
> storage." ;-)
>
> If SRP was in, can 'such as' be omitted? "for newer SCSI transports
> (Fibre Channel, FireWire storage, iSCSI, SAS, SRP),"
It might be necessary to add SSA too.
> Or would be "for newer SCSI transports such as Fibre Channel,
> FireWire storage, iSCSI, SAS, and more," be OK?
scsi-ml has SPI, FC, iSCSI, SAS, and SRP transport classes (SRP is in
scsi-misc now). It's a bit strange to omit only SRP, I think. But I
might be too SRP-biased.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists