[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070916193258.GD13543@flower.upol.cz>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:32:58 +0200
From: Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kbuild-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Rename asm-offsets tool or not? (Re: [patch 01/03] kbuild, asm-values: infrastructure)
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Oleg.
Hallo. Nice, you are bringing it back. I'll try to have LKML-like
output this time, not a makefile mess and stuff:
[]
> I see no value in renaming from asm_offset to asm_value - please drop it.
> Introducing the generic asm-values.h should wait and when you do
> you should be preapred to update all architectures (ecasue otherwise it
> will not happen).
All archs, are using same syntax. But.
Interesting exception is MIPS, where tokens are organized and implemented
more nicely, that is where *asm-values* name coming from, actually. One
can see all that text, size, constant tokens in addition to just offsets.
So, if name change isn't worth, then OK; filename compatibility check, as
one in `linux/Kbuild', is easy to hack as well to remove.
But nice feature/tool with meaningful name and functionality is just
another thing.
Opinions?
____
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists