[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709162137070.1817@scrub.home>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 21:38:38 +0200 (CEST)
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
cc: Matej Laitl <strohel@...il.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] menuconfig: distinguish between selected-by-another
options and comments
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >
> > > But can you take a look at distingushing between non-selectable options
> > > due to dependency issues and seleted-by symbols.
> >
> > Do you have an example in mind? If a symbol is not changable, but still
> > visible, a select is usually involved.
>
> On i86_64 (but I think the arch does not matter).
> make defconfig
> make menuconfig
>
> At top-level menu I see:
> --- Enable the block layer --->
>
> In block/Kconfig we have:
> menuconfig BLOCK
> bool "Enable the block layer" if EMBEDDED
> default y
>
> If EMBEDDED == n then we see the above.
> And this was my first experience with this patch - and it
> took me some thoughts to realise it was the "if EMBEDDED" part
> that made it look like -*-
Indeed, I forgot about this case. Here it's actually the menu entry of a
symbol that is forced to be visible, because a child entry is visible.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists